Searching ......
Read the article GM industry falling apart worldwide (The New Zealand Herald website). Complete the information transfer chart . The teacher models the process to encourage students using their own words. Students write the first one and then share with the rest of the class. If a large class then students should share with each other. Students complete the other two and then share what they have written with their neighbour.
There are many online texts on GM foods. Find two or three that suit the language needs of your students and ask them to list the arguments for or against and then share with a neighbour.
Whole class discussion of arguments for and against GM foods.
Give each student a copy of either the Monsanto internet task (35 kB), Organic Gardening Internet Task (Word 28KB) , or Potato Farmer Internet Task (Word 31KB) (electronic or hard copy). Complete the tasks (see Resources for URLs) then re-group the class into groups of three so that there is one potato farmer, one organic farmer, and a sales person from Monsanto in each group. Each person reports on their own findings, followed by group discussion of the three perspectives. Whole class discussion on findings.
The internet research task must be completed prior to this task.
So far, students have become familiar with the first and second performance criteria for US 12420, but they have not yet studied language features or techniques for shaping the text.
Complete the Language features resource sheet (Word 36KB) matching exercise:
The techniques chosen should be relevant for most of the text, that is they should "shape" the text. Look at the "Driving while Asian" text. Identify anecdotes and examples of Asian driving habits throughout the article. Using anecdotes or examples is one technique the writer has used to shape the text. Discuss the effects created by using this technique.
Students can also use their jigsaw reading texts to practise finding main ideas, explaining the significance of main ideas, and finding language features and techniques for shaping the text.
Hand out Getting Around Driving while Asian (Word 806KB) of the formative reading text for US 12420, "Driving while Asian". Read and discuss the questions (Word 25KB) . Students should write answers as a formative activity.
Students compare their answers to those in Getting Around Exemplar A (Word 24KB) . Now compare answers in Getting Around exemplar B (Word 21KB) to those in Exemplar A. Look at the answers for each question in turn, first in Exemplar A then in Exemplar B. Read the annotations underneath each answer. What differences do you notice between answers in each exemplar?
Look at Exemplar A's answers to 1.2 and 1.4. Unit standard 12420 requires analysis to meet both these performance criteria. As a class, talk about the higher level of interpretation evident in the 1.2 and 1.4 answers compared to the explanation required for pc 1.1 or the description required for 1.3.
The summative assessment can be done whenever you feel students are ready. This may be after giving feedback on the formative assessment and after further practice on weak areas.
Possible essay topic link to English 2.2.
To assist with forming an argument, students participate in an activity similar to a debate called Academic Controversy. Procedures for this activity are online at the Tasmania English Learning Area. Write the topic for the Academic Controversy, "New Zealand and Australia should have a common border for trade purposes", on the whiteboard.
The Information Transfer (Word 29KB) is a graphic organiser to help students organise their ideas for transactional writing.
Formative reading text 2: I Feel Like an Animal in a Cage (Word 37KB)
Ask your students to make up some questions based on the formative texts they have read in class so far. Tell them to make their questions open-ended so that they can include a wide range of sources. The questions need to allow them to include factual information but also to make judgments. Some examples are:
Ask the class to study the exemplars in their student instruction booklet.
Organise a jigsaw activity. Divide the class into small groups and ask each one to focus on a particular exemplar. The group must list the sources of information used in their particular exemplar. Have the students feed back to the class.
Record the sources of information on a large piece of paper which can be put up as a poster for later reference.
Suggestions:
Internet
It is essential that students use their time efficiently. Teachers need to check that students can search, scan for appropriate sites, skim read to locate information. They need to copy the website reference into their own document. They also need to quote the language from the source that they are going to make their own comments on. They will need to summarise information on the context or situation that language was used in.
The database EPIC is available to schools from the National Library.
This provides easy access to a huge number of sources, sites, articles, newspaper material as well as magazines. The databases that are recommended for this topic include EBSCO (Australia/New Zealand Reference Centre), InfoTrac Onefile and RDS Contemporary Women's Issues (One of the GALE databases). Not only is this collection carefully edited, it also carries citation details and all articles have a level of difficulty indicator. The Toolbox is also another excellent feature. To access EPIC you need to enter a user id and password that should have been sent to your principal. If you do have access to EPIC it is strongly recommended that you familiarise yourself with access first before using it with a class.
In class have students suggest what these might be. Try "immigration" and specify the country, eg "immigration in New Zealand", "immigration issues", "racism in a specify country", "refugees in New Zealand", "adjusting to a new culture", "immigration and refugees". These produced many results on EPIC.
Practise note making.
Cut up sections of ReadingText2 (Word 33KB) . Make sure you include sections that contain language features suitable for analysis. Paste the text in paragraph blocks allowing space between each block for students to write a short paraphrase/summary.
Tell students they can use abbreviations and they can write in incomplete sentences. They are looking for the main idea and one or two examples. They must record details of the author, title, publisher and publication date for every example.
Model the exercise on the whiteboard as a class activity.
Students should be given the opportunity to practise summarising skills with every text they encounter for close reading exercises. Use graphic organisers.
Here is another idea that Aida Walqui recommends. Paste the target text in paragraph chunks or slightly longer sections so that there is a 5cm margin down the right hand side of the page headed up "notes". Introduce the content by prefacing what the text is about in a sentence at the start of each section. "The Afghani immigrant, a hardworking man, tells his story. Read about how his family found their arrival in Australia an unpleasant experience" It can also be in question form: "Why is Mr Ahmed worried about his daughter?" These prompts act as hooks to draw the reader into the content. Students read and write notes alongside the text.
Students could also set out their information as follows:
Show students how to set out a bibliography. For a student handout use How to set out a Bibliography (Word 33KB) .
Writers: Jill Crewe and Jessica Holden
Achievement standard being assessed
AS90376 (English 2.2):
Achievement standard 90376 assesses similar outcomes to unit standard 8825 [Produce transactional written text in complex forms].
Both standards require the same overall standard of writing to gain achievement [2.2] and credit [8825].
Even though the two standards assess similar outcomes, there are some differences in terminology. The term "conventions" is used in performance criteria 1.3 [8825] to mean style and structure. "Conventions" in the formal writing achievement standard refers to grammar, spelling, grammar, and punctuation.
The standard of technical accuracy required in 8825's pc 1.4: " Final product is crafted to publication standard" is identical to achievement level for 2.2 conventions criterion: "use writing conventions accurately."
Achievement criteria
Language learning outcomes
Students will:
This achievement standard is derived from English in the New Zealand Curriculum, Learning Media, Ministry of Education, 1994, up to and including Level 7.
Writing: Transactional Writing, Exploring Language, Thinking Critically, often with links to Processing Information
with links to
Reading: Personal Reading, Close Reading
Speaking: Using Texts
Listening: Listening to Texts.
Students write and develop a film review suitable for publication in a school newspaper. The review must be on a film studied in class.
The same conditions for assessment apply when assessing the internally assessed writing achievement standard 90376 Produce crafted and developed formal transactional writing [2.2] and unit standard 8825 [Produce transactional written text in complex forms] - or any internally assessed unit or achievement writing standard at any level. Teachers must be satisfied that the work is the students'. Students should complete internally assessed writing work class. If the pieces are to be assessed for summative assessment, teachers should ensure that the extent of teacher input does not compromise assessment validity; in other words, the writing is the students', not the teachers'.
This is an internal assessment and as such should be worked on only in the classroom under teacher supervision. To ensure authenticity, students work should be held by the teacher between periods.
Teachers may guide students actively through the initial tasks helping them to identify techniques mentioned. Teachers may show how the techniques used in the exemplars can be applied to students' own writing.
As they develop drafts, teachers can advise students that their writing may need further work on ideas, language, structure or accuracy in spelling, punctuation or paragraphing but not correct errors. Students should have access to dictionaries to check their writing. Word processing is acceptable providing it is done under teacher supervision.
Consultation should occur with each student prior to the final submission. Students should have several opportunities during the year to develop their transactional writing skills.
NB: Teachers using this unit will need to check that it accords with their school assessment policy.
Learning task 1
Learning task 2
Learning task 3
WritingAFilmReview (Word 29KB) AssessmentSchedule (Word 44KB)
Literacy Online is a site for primary and secondary literacy teachers in New Zealand and internationally. English Online and ESOL Online are sister sites.
For further information on this site email Catriona Pene at [email protected]
The Ministry of Education will work with the sector, parents, families and whānau to remove National Standards Ngā Whanaketanga Rumaki Māori. We want to focus on children's progress and achievement, across the wider curricula, while not forgetting the importance of foundation skills of literacy and numeracy, te reo matatini and pangarau.
See Assessment Online for more details »
Assessment Online helps school leaders and teachers in gathering, analysing, interpreting, and using information about students' progress and achievement. The emphasis is on the formative use of assessment to improve students’ learning and teachers’ teaching as both respond to the information it provides.
« Previous Next » 1... 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 ...1214